i got my hair cut last night and i
hafta say: given a choice between the phase 1 girl and the phase 2 girl at the
paul mitchell school, pick phase 1 every time!
i typically go for the phase 1-er, but when i made my appointment yesterday i was loathing my hair extra strong so i decided to treat myself to the extra experience a phase 2
masta could offer. after all, i deserve it.
don't get me wrong - she did a good job. and after the cut ferments/sets up/cures/ripens in a few days, i might even post a picture as a gleaming endorsement of the
pms (
paul mitchell school - what were you thinking??) and
i'll say that my hairs hard to handle. it's thick and curly in weird places. but this stylist in training did not inspire a lot of confidence.
you know that feeling when
someone's combing your hair and they pull so hard that it feels like they're pulling your hair out of your scalp and you start to cry a little?? well
i've never felt that and if you're styling my hair like your arms are made of wet noodles, then that's just a sign of weakness in my eyes. i bit my tongue to keep from yelling, "
c'mon! put your back into it!"
anyway,
all's well that ends well, but here's my theory: the phase 1 students are bright-eyed and eager. they follow technique to a 't' and know they have a lot to learn. to me, the phase 2 kiddos seem to have a certain sense of entitlement, think they're masters and take a certain
amount of artistic liberty with your
coif. which
i'm not
ok with, unless
i'm paying you $200, you ask "sparking or still?" when i want water and your salon staff looks like an army of
calvin klein models,
capiche?